Search Results

The pseudonymous Canadian super-fan, who has had over 552 of his 2,045 letters published across comics in seven years, discusses his letter-writing habits while carefully guarding his real identity. He reflects on the value of fan letters to editors (primarily useful as aggregate feedback rather than plot influence), the importance of writing because you have something to say rather than to get published, and his concerns about the industry's narrow market focus and the need to diversify beyond the superhero/fantasy genre to attract new readers. He also shares his views on European and Japanese comics and the pricing challenges facing independent publishers in Canada.

An extended two-part letters exchange in which Canadian reader T.M. Maple and Boatz debate the definition of censorship at length, ultimately agreeing that snuff films and child pornography should be illegal but disagreeing on whether such legal prohibitions constitute "censorship."

Reader letters responding primarily to issue #24; topics include the recurring debate over women in comics and whether male writers can portray women credibly, praise for the Sal Buscema interview, and a playful letter from T.M. Maple responding to his own profile.

Reader T.M. Maple praises the group-interview format of issue #39 while critiquing the overuse of multi-part installments and the shrinking letters column; DAK hints at a possible Comics Interview compendium. Reader E. Hoffmann Price argues that ancient Egyptians invented comics through illustrated papyrus narratives.

Two substantial letters on the censorship debate: one from Richard S. McEnroe arguing DC's new ratings signal the end of mature work at the major publishers and urging creators to find independent publishers; and one from T.M. Maple engaging in a philosophical debate over whether criminal law restrictions on extreme content constitute censorship.

Reader T.M. Maple praises the diversity of issue #45 and playfully riffs on being compared to Bob Rozakis; reader Frank Bonilla argues against comics censorship, contending that rating systems produce bland work and that the best response to objectionable material is simply not to buy it.

A multi-issue ongoing debate between reader T.M. Maple and associate editor Darrel Boatz on the definition and limits of censorship; Boatz announces he is writing a longer piece on the definition of censorship for future publication.